Cloud-Assisted Computation Offloading to Support Mobile Services
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The widespread use and increasing capabilities of mobiles devices are making them a viable platform for offering mobile services. However, the increasing resource demands of mobile services and the inherent constraints of mobile devices limit the quality and type of functionality that can be offered, preventing mobile devices from exploiting their full potential as reliable service providers. Computation offloading offers mobile devices the opportunity to transfer resource-intensive computations to more resourcefulcomputing infrastructures. We present a framework for cloud-assisted mobile service provisioning to assist mobile devices in delivering reliable services. The framework supports dynamic offloading based on the resource status of mobile systems and current network conditions, while satisfying the user-defined energy constraints. It also enables the mobile provider to delegate the cloud infrastructure to forward the service response directly to the user when no further processing is required by the provider. Performance evaluation shows up to 6x latency improvement for computation-intensive services that do not require large data transfer. Experiments show that the operation of the cloud-assisted service provisioning framework does not pose significant overhead on mobile resources, yet it offers robust and efficient computation offloading.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it