Effect of Dietary Plant Sterols and/or Mayonnaise Supplementation on the Lipid Metabolisms in Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plant sterols are effective inhibitors of cholesterol absorption. Examination was made of the physiological effects of plant sterols and/or mayonnaise on this inhibition in rats. Male Wistar rats were divided into four groups (Control, PS, MS, MS+PS) and provided experimental diets for three weeks. The diets of two groups (PS, MS+PS) contained 0.5% plant sterols with or without 2% mayonnaise, while those of the other two groups (Control, MS) did not contain the sterols. PS and MS+PS groups had lower serum and hepatic cholesterol concentrations, and had higher serum HDL-cholesterol concentration than Control and MS groups. Fecal excretion of neutral sterols was noted to increase in PS and MS+PS groups. Plant sterols persisted even when the sterols had been mixed with mayonnaise. The mayonnaise addition may thus be concluded to have no effect on the inhibitory action of plant sterols which in this study were found to reduce serum and hepatic cholesterol concentrations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".