Text-Dependent Speaker Recognition With Random Digit Strings
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we explore joint factor analysis (JFA) for text-dependent speaker recognition with random digit strings. The core of the proposed method is a JFA model by which we extract features. These features can either represent overall utterances or individual digits, and are fed into a trainable backend to estimate likelihood ratios. Within this framework, several extensions are proposed. First is a logistic regression method for combining log-likelihood ratios that correspond to individual mixture components. Second is the extraction of phonetically aware Baum-Welch statistics, by using forced alignment instead of the typical posterior probabilities that are derived by the universal background model. We also explore a digit-string-dependent way to apply score normalization that exhibits a notable improvement compared to the standard one. By fusing six JFA features, we attained 2.01% and 3.19% equal error rates on male and female, respectively, on the challenging RSR2015 (part III) dataset.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it