MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336042886

Sustainable Design in a Second Year Engineering Design Course

2010· article· en· W2336042886 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational journal of engineering education · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Education and Curriculum Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumCreativitySustainabilitySustainable designEngineeringEngineering ethicsEngineering managementObligationEngineering design processEngineering educationTest (biology)Social responsibilityDesign educationSociologyPedagogyPolitical scienceBusinessPublic relationsMechanical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Engineers have a primary responsibility to help society develop sustainably. Engineering education has an obligation to integratesustainable design principles into the curriculum of all engineers. This paper describes the integration of sustainable design principlesinto a second year engineering design course taken by all engineering students at the University of Guelph. The approach requiresstudents to develop and measure their design-build-test project from three specific measures to reflect economic, societal andenvironmental dimensions of their system. Many students are able to understand the challenges associated with succeeding by all threemeasures within the same design. These students see the importance of creativity and innovation in overcoming the apparent conflicts.However, it is also evident that the efforts to date are not sufficient to deeply embed sustainable design thinking in all of the students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.378
Threshold uncertainty score0.789

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it