MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2337016723 · doi:10.1108/rjta-09-03-2005-b012

The Applications of Biotextiles in Tissue Engineering

2005· article· en· W2337016723 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Journal of Textile and Apparel · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalHôpital Saint-François d'Assise
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTissue engineeringScaffoldTextileBiochemical engineeringEngineeringNanotechnologyBiomedical engineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tissue engineering has gained wide acceptance since its discovery due to its potential for replacing diseased and injured human tissues and organs. Biotextiles composed of textile fibrous structures can be designed and engineered to achieve specific performances demanded by various tissue engineering applications. Several key factors, such as the selection of cells, the material and form of the scaffold, and the regulation of cell growth and proliferation, govern the effective use of biotextiles for tissue engineering end uses. This paper examines the current techniques used in the field of tissue engineering and explains how the disciplines of polymer chemistry, fibre science, and textile technology and engineering have a unique role to play when combined with molecular biology, biochemistry, and biotechnology to design and develop novel biotextile scaffolds for tissue engineering applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.460
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it