MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2338914764 · doi:10.7202/1035625ar

Juridicité et normativité dans la théorie sociojuridique de R.A. Macdonald

2016· article· fr· W2338914764 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue générale de droit · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicLegal Systems and Institutions
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La théorie sociologique du droit, développée par le professeur Roderick A. Macdonald (Université McGill) sur des bases fort originales, s’inscrit dans la perspective d’un pluralisme juridique critique. Pour mieux en saisir la spécificité et la fécondité, l’auteur propose de comparer cette théorie avec l’approche qui fut défendue par Max Weber, l’une des figures les plus importantes de la discipline. La comparaison fait apparaître un nombre significatif de convergences, tant sur le plan épistémologique et méthodologique que sur le plan substantif. Elle met également en lumière certaines divergences fondamentales qui portent sur la définition du droit et le concept de norme. A cet égard, l’auteur croit que l’approche wébérienne présente l’avantage de livrer, à titre heuristique, des critères permettant de délimiter un champ spécifique du juridique, alors que la théorie de Macdonald, en dépit d’apports indéniables, n’autorise pas une distinction adéquate entre la normativité sociale et la normativité juridique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.789
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it