MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2338938359 · doi:10.14288/1.0099652

Population structure and mating patterns of Killer Whales (Orcinus orca) as revealed by DNA analysis

2009· article· en· W2338938359 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationWhaleBiologyGeographyMatingPopulation structureFisheryEvolutionary biologyEcologyDemographySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis reports a genetic investigation of population segregation, social organization, and mating patterns in killer whales (Orcinus orca) of the northeastern Pacific Ocean. Previous studies identified two sympatric, non-associating populations, fish-eating residents and mammal-eating transients, and described many aspects of their demography, ecology, and social behaviour. Less is known about a third offshore population. Here, I focused on two aspects of killer whale social organization that are unusual among wellstudied mammals: maintenance of complete segregation between residents and transients in sympatry, and lack of dispersal in individual residents of either sex. I began by developing and testing lightweight pressure-propelled biopsy darts. They were an efficient way of acquiring skin samples from free-ranging whales and caused only minor behavioural responses in sampled animals. Using these darts and sampling stranded carcasses, colleagues and I collected biopsies from 269 individually-identified killer whales in British Columbia and Alaska. I used DNA from the biopsies to sequence the mitochondrial D-loop of 111 matrilines, and genotyped all individuals at 11 polymorphic microsatellite loci. I found that residents and transients are strongly differentiated genetically and that there is little or no gene flow between them. Both are divided into three genetically-differentiated regional subpopulations. Each resident subpopulation is more closely related to other resident subpopulations than to any transient subpopulation and vice versa, implying that the differences between residents and transients stem from a single divergence. The offshore population is not closely related to either of the other populations. The propensity of killer whales to live in fixed groups of a few hundred individuals apparently allows sympatric or parapatric populations to diverge genetically and could eventually result in speciation. I examined mating patterns in residents by conducting paternity tests and analysing fixation indices based on microsatellite genotypes. I found that residents rarely mate within their pods. Further, in the most thoroughly-sampled resident subpopulation, most matings were between rather than within acoustic clans (groups of pods with similar acoustic repertoires). Because pods within clans proved to be closely related, inter-clan mating appears to be an inbreeding avoidance mechanism. Most matings were between individuals from the same subpopulation. This pattern of population segregation coupled with inbreeding avoidance closely resembles marriage patterns in many human societies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it