Design of an Optically Transparent Reflectarray for Solar Applications Using Indium Tin Oxide
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Optically transparent planar antennas made of transparent conductive oxide (TCO) have attracted considerable attention in research over the years, particularly for solar panel applications. However, their design has proved difficult due to their inherent conductor losses. This paper focuses on the design of an optically transparent reflectarray using indium tin oxide, which is a type of TCO. The design is composed of subwavelength rectangular patch elements that exhibit 272° of phase range and mitigate conductor losses in reflectarray operation. This paper examines the behavior and response of lossy reflectarray unit cells and investigates different techniques to reduce the impact of loss in TCO reflectarray designs, primarily using different patch geometries and subwavelength elements. The proposed element design is simulated and experimentally characterized. A full reflectarray prototype operating at 26 GHz is successfully demonstrated and fabricated, with the simulated and experimental results in good agreement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it