MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2340277384 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2015-0500

Equation to predict maximum pipe stress incorporating internal and external loadings on buried pipes

2016· article· en· W2340277384 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsInro Consultants (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite element methodInternal pressurePipeline transportStructural engineeringGeotechnical engineeringStress (linguistics)EngineeringLimitingCorrosionLateral earth pressureGeologyMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringMetallurgyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pipelines used for water and other services are very important lifelines in modern society. Commonly, these buried pipes are subjected to significant stresses due to external (traffic and earth) and internal (water pressure) loads. As many of these pipelines were laid sometime in the last century or earlier, in most cases their condition has deteriorated primarily by electrochemical and (or) microbiological corrosion. Corrosion activity (internal and external) can manifest in various forms, but in many cases will lead to reduced pipe thickness, which in turn leads to an increase in pipe stresses induced by the external and internal loads. Currently available analytical procedures to estimate pipe stresses are based on oversimplifications such as the two-dimensional (2-D) analysis based on Winkler springs, limiting their application to general pipe burial conditions. This paper describes the application of a three-dimensional (3-D) finite element method to analyse a buried pipe subjected to external and internal loads. Firstly, the finite element model is validated against the data from field tests conducted on the basis of a cast iron pipe that was laid in 1930 at Strathfield, Sydney, Australia. The results of these 3-D finite element analyses are then used to develop a closed-form expression to predict maximum stresses in pipes of different sizes buried in different soil types. Having obtained a good agreement between the proposed model outcomes and the 3-D finite element analysis results, the proposed model has been validated against the field test data under different internal and external loadings. The verified outcomes of the model reveal that it can be used to predict maximum stresses without conducting a full-scale finite element analysis, which often requires specific computational resources and computational skills. Furthermore, the proposed model can be used in probabilistic analyses, where a large number of calculations need to be carried out to account for the uncertainty of the input variables. The applications of the model are also discussed in relation to the assessment of pipe performance and remaining safe life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score0.811

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it