MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2340761181 · doi:10.1109/rams.2016.7448007

Modeling failure and maintenance effects of a system subject to multiple preventive maintenance types

2016· article· en· W2340761181 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReliability and Maintenance Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreventive maintenanceUnavailabilityCorrective maintenanceReliability engineeringPlanned maintenanceReliability (semiconductor)DowntimeProcess (computing)EngineeringProactive maintenanceRisk analysis (engineering)Computer scienceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada's mining sector contributed $54 billion to its GDP in 2013. Mining operations are an important element of Canada's economy and rely heavily on mobile equipment for the transportation of rock-ore. Failure of mobile equipment, when it is required to be in available state prevents the successful flow of mining operations, and can result in production losses averaging in millions of tons, annually. Consequently, the availability - and by extension, reliability - of mobile equipment have a direct economic impact on mine productivity. A mobile equipment's failures are the greatest contributors to its unavailability - and are observed to occur randomly. Typically, to help diagnose and curb mobile equipment failures, corrective and preventive maintenance policies are implemented. Maintenance personnel are concerned with quantifying the effect of multiple preventive maintenance policies on mobile equipment reliability and availability. Generally, this is performed by modelling the reliability of repairable systems. In most studies, it is assumed that repairable systems are subject to only one type of repair/maintenance, and the effect of repair/maintenance is captured using a single repair factor in an age reduction or intensity reduction model. In this paper, we consider a repairable system whose failures follow a Non-Homogenous Poisson Process, and the system is subject to corrective and several types of preventive maintenance. While the effect of corrective maintenance is minimal, a preventive maintenance may reduce the age of the system effectively. We assume different effects for different preventive maintenance types, and develop the likelihood function to estimate the failure process and preventive maintenance effects, simultaneously. We also derive the conditional reliability and the expected number of failures between two consecutive preventive maintenance types. The proposed methods are applied to a case study of two trucks used in a mining site. The proposed methods provide excellent predictions with the potential of becoming very useful in practice and of leading to further generalizations of repairable systems analyses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReliability and Maintenance OptimizationFrench-language works237,207