MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W234077628

Towards the Pluralist City? Distribution and Localization of Visible Minorities in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver in 2001/vers la Ville Pluraliste? Distribution et Localisation Des Minorites Visibles a Montreal, Toronto et Vancouver En 2001 *

2007· article· en· W234077628 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Regional Science · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRural development and sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRepartitionImmigrationHumanitiesCohesion (chemistry)SociologyEthnic groupContext (archaeology)EthnologyPolitical scienceGeographyAnthropologyLawPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstracts The increasing immigration to Canada during the 1990s has generated, if not a threat, at least some public concerns about the formation of ethnic enclaves and ghettos, and about their potential effects on social cohesion. In this context, this paper offers a reconsideration of the question of ethnic segregation in Canadian cities. Its main purpose is to show how the situation of Canadian cities can be analyzed through a pluralist framework. To illustrate this, the empirical part of the paper uses a special set of data from the 2001 census. This set of data is treated using threshold measures and a knowledge-based classification method both developed recently. The method also includes thematic cartography to localize types of neighbourhoods. The results of the study confirm the pluralist character of the three metropolis under study, and lead the way to new critical works which are more able to take into account the growing complexity of this phenomenon. Resumes La croissance de l'immigration a destination du Canada dans le courant des annees 1990 a suscite, si ce n'est de l'inquietude, du moins certaines preoccupations quant a la possible formation d'enclaves ethniques ou de ghettos et leurs effets sur la cohesion sociale. Dans ce contexte, cet article se propose de revenir sur la segregation ethnique au sein des villes canadiennes. Il poursuit des lors, comme objectif principal, d'indiquer comment la situation des villes canadiennes peut etre comprise aujourd'hui au travers d'un cadre d'analyse pluraliste. Au niveau empirique, les donnees utilisees dans cet article proviennent d'une compilation speciale du recensement de 2001. Elles sont traitees a l'aide d'une technique de mesure par seuil et d'une classification raisonnee toutes deux developpees recemment. La / cartographie thematique est enfin mobilisee pour localiser les differents types de quartiers dans l'espace des trois metropoles a l'etude. Les resultats ainsi obtenus confirment le caractere pluraliste des trois grandes metropoles du pays et ouvrent la voie a des travaux critiques et nuances capables de saisir la complexite croissante du phenomene. Introduction L'accroissement de l'immigration a destination du Canada et sa concentration urbaine ont commence a susciter, si ce n'est de l'inquietude, au moins certaines interrogations au sein de l'opinion publique, quant a la formation d'enclaves ethniques, voire de >. (1) Des recherches recentes ont pu montrer que le nombre de quartiers ou les minorites visibles representaient une part substantielle de la population (plus de 30 %) ont augmente au Canada entre 1981 et 2001, ainsi que le fait que les groupes immigrants n'ont pas eu tendance a se disperser dans l'espace urbain, les effets lies a l'allongement de la periode d'installation et a la cohorte d'arrivee se voyant annuler par l' afflux de nouveaux arrivants (Hou 2006; Hou et Picot 2004). Toutefois, ces recherches precisent aussi que cette concentration des immigrants et des groupes de minorite visible ne va pas de paire avec la creation de ce qu'il convient de designer par la notion de >. Au contraire, de nombreux travaux soulignent la diversite des formes d'insertion residentielle des immigrants, les liens entre immigration, pauvrete et conditions de vie et de logement devenant aujourd'hui particulierement complexes (Smith 2004). Dans un tel contexte, marque par l'incertitude et des interpretations contradictoires, il est judicieux de revenir sur la segregation ethnique et sur ses effets : quel est le niveau d'enclavement des minorites dans les villes canadiennes ? Quels sont les differents types de quartiers ou se concentrent les groupes minoritaires ? Quelles sont les conditions de vie et de logement des minorites dans les villes canadiennes ? L'objectif du present article est de tenter d'apporter des reponses a ses differentes questions en menant une analyse descriptive de la segregation ethnique a l'echelle des secteurs de recensement (SR) dans les trois principales metropoles canadiennes en 2001. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.332
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it