Centralized and Localized Data Congestion Control Strategy for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks Using a Machine Learning Clustering Algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In an urban environment, intersections are critical locations in terms of road crashes and number of killed or injured people. Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) can help reduce the traffic collisions at intersections by sending warning messages to the vehicles. However, the performance of VANETs should be enhanced to guarantee delivery of the messages, particularly safety messages to the destination. Data congestion control is an efficient way to decrease packet loss and delay and increase the reliability of VANETs. In this paper, a centralized and localized data congestion control strategy is proposed to control data congestion using roadside units (RSUs) at intersections. The proposed strategy consists of three units for detecting congestion, clustering messages, and controlling data congestion. In this strategy, the channel usage level is measured to detect data congestion in the channels. The messages are gathered, filtered, and then clustered by machine learning algorithms. K-means algorithm clusters the messages based on message size, validity of messages, and type of messages. The data congestion control unit determines appropriate values of transmission range and rate, contention window size, and arbitration interframe spacing for each cluster. Finally, RSUs at the intersections send the determined communication parameters to the vehicles stopped before the red traffic lights to reduce communication collisions. Simulation results show that the proposed strategy significantly improves the delay, throughput, and packet loss ratio in comparison with other congestion control strategies using the proposed congestion control strategy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".