MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2344230770 · doi:10.1039/c5cs00011d

Synthesis of catalytic materials in flames: opportunities and challenges

2016· review· en· W2344230770 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Society Reviews · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
FundersEidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
KeywordsCatalysisMixing (physics)Dispersion (optics)Chemical engineeringGas phaseMaterials scienceParticle (ecology)NanoparticleNanotechnologyProcess engineeringChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proven capacity of flame aerosol technology for rapid and scalable synthesis of functional nanoparticles makes it ideal for the manufacture of an array of heterogeneous catalysts. Capitalizing on the high temperature environment, rapid cooling and intimate component mixing at either atomic or nano scale, novel catalysts with unique physicochemical properties have been made using flame processes. This tutorial review covers the main features of flame synthesis and illustrates how the physical and chemical properties of as-synthesized solid catalytic materials can be controlled by proper choice of the process parameters. Gas phase particle formation mechanisms and the effect of synthesis conditions (reactor configuration, precursor and dispersion gas flow rates, temperature and concentration fields) on the structural, chemical and catalytic properties of as-prepared materials are discussed. Finally, opportunities and challenges offered by flame synthesis of catalytic materials are addressed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it