A Novel Statistical Cost Model and an Algorithm for Efficient Application Offloading to Clouds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work presents a novel statistical cost model for applications that can be offloaded to cloud computing environments. The model constructs a tree structure, referred to as the execution dependency tree (EDT), to accurately represent various execution relations, or dependencies (e.g., sequential, parallel and conditional branching) among the application modules, along its different execution paths. Contrary to existing models that assume fixed average offloading costs, each module's cost is modelled as a random variable described by its Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) that is statistically estimated through application profiling. Using this model, we generalize the offloading cost optimization functions to those that use more user tailored statistical measures such as cost percentiles. We employ these functions to propose an efficient offloading algorithm based on a dynamic programming formulation. We also show that the proposed model can be used as an efficient tool for application analysis by developers to gain insights on the applications' statistical performance under varying network conditions and users behaviours. Performance evaluation results show that the achieved mean absolute percentage error between the model-based estimated cost and the measured one for the application execution time can be as small as 5 percent for applications with sequential and branching module dependencies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".