Online Feature Selection Based on Fuzzy Clustering and Its Applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering has been successfully applied in various pattern recognition areas. While FCM is gaining attention, an important issue arising from these studies is the need to determine which attributes of the data should be used. Answering this question is difficult, because there is no labeled training data available in clustering to guide the search. We present a feature selection for FCM. The advantage of our method is that it is intuitively appealing, avoiding combinatorial searches, and allowing us to prune the feature set. Our method is also adaptable and can change through complex scenes in an online environment. We do not have to wait until all data have been generated before learning begins. Finally, to estimate the model parameters, the gradient method is adopted to minimize the fuzzy objective function with the Kullback-Leibler divergence information. Numerical experiments are presented to demonstrate the robustness and accuracy of our method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it