MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2344469604 · doi:10.1109/tnet.2016.2523242

On the Distance-Sensitive and Load-Balanced Information Storage and Retrieval for 3D Sensor Networks

2016· article· en· W2344469604 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNatural Science Foundation of Hubei ProvinceChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceData retrievalGraphConstraint (computer-aided design)Focus (optics)Wireless sensor networkKey (lock)Graph theoryPath (computing)Data miningDistributed computingTheoretical computer scienceComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efficient in-network information storage and retrieval is of paramount importance to sensor networks and has attracted a large number of studies while most of them focus on 2D fields. In this paper, we propose novel Reeb graph based information storage and retrieval schemes for 3D sensor networks. The key is to extract the line-like skeleton from the Reeb graph of a network, based on which two distance-sensitive information storage and retrieval schemes are developed: one devoted to shorter retrieval path and the other devoted to more balanced load. Desirably, the proposed algorithms have no reliance on the geographic location or boundary information, and have no constraint on the network shape or communication graph. The extensive simulations also show their efficiency in terms of sensor storage load and retrieval path length.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.629

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it