Respiration Disorders Classification With Informative Features for m-Health Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Respiratory disorder is a highly prevalent condition associated with many adverse health problems. As the current means of diagnosis are obtrusive and ill-suited for real-time m-health applications, we explore a convenient and low-cost automatic approach that uses wearable microelectromechanical system sensor technology. The proposed system introduces the use of motion sensors to detect the changes in the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest wall during breathing function as well as extracting the informative respiratory features to be used for breathing disorders classification. Extensive evaluations are provided on six well-known classifiers with novel feature extraction techniques to distinguish among eight different pathological breathing patterns. The effects of the number of sensors, sensor placement, as well as feature selection on the classification performance are discussed. The experimental results conducted with ten subjects show the best accuracy rates of 97.50% by support vector machine and 97.37% with decision tree bagging (DTB) with all features and after feature selection, correspondingly. Furthermore, a binary classification is proposed for distinguishing between healthy people and patients with breath problems. The different assessments of classification parameters are provided by measuring the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score and Mathew correlation coefficient. The accuracy rates above 98% suggest superior performance of DTB in binary recognition supported by the suggested new features.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".