MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W234710640

Making a Case for Reparations

2007· article· en· W234710640 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Pan-African Studies · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRace, History, and American Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDamagesDiasporaPolitical scienceHistoryLawSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Reparations is one of the most misunderstood topics in recent years, and it is gradually becoming an area where even some angels fear to trend. There are now protagonists and antagonists of reparations all over the world, and it has divided people along racial lines. Most blacks want the payment of reparations to Africans and their descendant in the Diaspora because of the indescribable damages that have been done to the continent by the slave trade that took place over four hundred years ago. The late Chief M.K.O. Abiola belonged to this school of thought, but most whites regard such demands as frivolous, irrelevant and thus, should be ignored. In view of the above, I intend to define the concept of reparations, highlight some irreparable damages of the Atlantic slave trade, the consequences for the blacks, and provide an analysis of the contentions of the opponents of reparations. I shall then make a case for reparations, and conclude. It is interesting to note that when the Jews, Japanese, the North American Indians in Canada demanded and received reparations for the injuries inflicted on them, the world was positively silent, but the story was different when the blacks made similar demands. This is because the motives for these demands were misunderstood. The demand for reparations for blacks is not a phenomenon of the present century, and it was not originated by Africans and their descendants, but rather by William Wilberforce, a devoted Christian who made the first demand for reparations on behalf of Africans on the floor of the British Parliament when the slave trade had not been abolished in Britain. He made this demand in his final speech to his colleagues for the abolition of the slave trade, on the eve of his retirement from the British Parliament. The Concept of Reparations As stated above, the concept of reparations had been widely misunderstood, because the motive behind the demand had also been misunderstood, and misinterpreted. The word reparations is derived from the Latin word repare and it means to repair, and its present usage has not departed from its original meaning. Thus, reparations is simply a call or demand by the blacks of all nations and their descendant that participated and profited from the Atlantic slave trade that lasted for about four hundreds years, to repair or alleviate the legacies of underdevelopment, miseries, poverty and other problems associated with the trade in Africa and the Diaspora (these damages are enormous and the blacks are unable to carry out the repairs alone). Irreparable Damages: Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade The trans-Atlantic slave trade has been described as one of the most inhuman events that has ever been recorded in human history; based on injustice, oppression, physical force, and slave owners who had the power of life and death over enslaved (Conrad 1986:22), a point was vividly highlighted by David Barry Gasper, when he said: ... when Antiga enslaved were executed for crimes, or when they were hunted down and killed as fugitives (by their owners), their owners were entitled to compensation from public funds after they had filed claims or petitions to the legislature (Gasper 1992 : 307). The unlimited powers of these slave owners in the peak of the slave trade resulted in the death of millions of black enslaved in America, and were once regarded economically as an important means of replenishing the working population on the plantations, and ideologically as a gratifying means of rescuing pagan souls for Christianity (Conrad 1983:3). Thus, it is also relevant to note that historians had not been able to record all the atrocities that were committed during the four decades of the slave trade which could be partly attributed to the fact that even when the slave trade had been officially abolished, some die-hard slave dealers still carried on with the trade because of the enormous profits they realized from this cruel business. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it