MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Development of Replaceable Cast Steel Links for Eccentrically Braced Frames

2016· article· en· W2347142240 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Structural Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural engineeringBucklingDuctility (Earth science)Steel frameEngineeringBracingResilience (materials science)Limit state designMaterials scienceBraceComposite materialCreep

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Replaceable links for eccentrically braced steel frames (EBFs) decouple the yielding links from the floor beams to facilitate rapid repair or replacement after a seismic event. Replaceable links that are composed of rolled or built-up steel sections are, however, susceptible to the same failure modes as links in conventional EBFs. These failure modes include fracture in the base metal or welds, local buckling, and lateral-torsional buckling, all of which limit the ductility of the link and consequently, the overall ductility of the frame. An extensive numerical analysis study was completed to develop replaceable cast steel link concepts, with practical connection details, that combine the advantages of replaceable links with the geometric freedom and material properties inherent to castings. Results indicate that the unique geometry of the proposed concepts achieves a larger rotation capacity and longer low-cycle fatigue life by evenly distributing flexural yielding over the entire length of the link and minimizing stress concentrations. The replaceable cast steel links have the potential to significantly improve the performance, reliability, robustness, and resilience of EBFs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it