MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2352450042

Design and Study of Adaptive Filter with LabVIEW

2011· article· en· W2352450042 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocomputer applications · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAdaptive filterLeast mean squares filterKernel adaptive filterRecursive least squares filterFilter (signal processing)Filter designSensitivity (control systems)Prototype filterFunction (biology)AlgorithmControl theory (sociology)Electronic engineeringArtificial intelligenceComputer vision
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to solve the complex programming problem of adaptive filters and the inconvenient to test the actual performance of filters as a virtual instrument system in real applications,the Least Mean Square(LMS) and Recursive Least Square(RLS) algorithms based adaptive filters are designed based on adaptive filter toolkit of LabVIEW8.6.The parameters which can affect these two algorithms are carried on the analysis to filter's sensitivity and the filters's performance are verified by audio signal.The simulation results shows the function comprehensive characteristic of the adaptive filters with the good man-machine interface.It can be convenient for engineers to develop efficiently,So,the system developed in this paper has good practical engineering value.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it