MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W236047338 · doi:10.1353/srm.2011.0016

Written on the Water: British Romanticism and the Maritime Empire of Culture by Samuel Baker

2011· article· en· W236047338 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Romanticism · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTravel Writing and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipEnlightenmentRomanticismHumanismEmpireGreenwichSociologyArt historyMedia studiesHistoryClassicsPhilosophyPolitical scienceLawEpistemologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BOOK REVIEWS 543 the project of which TIE is a part asks us to think about using media to be more collaborative across greater distances. As Renaissance Humanism and the Enlightenment demonstrated, humanities scholarship has always been inherently a collective and collaborative activity, dependent as much upon the mastery of available media as upon ideas. The current ways in which we go about the business ofliterary and cultural study, via conferences and through the single-authored monographs, articles, and reviews, does not take full advantage of the new forms of organizing knowledge currently available to us. Whether or not this review forum is successful, like This is Enlightenment, it seeks to point toward a future of humanities scholarship that may be very different from the one that we currently inhabit. The two most important research fields ofthe past two decades—history ofthe book and digital humanities—have shown ways in which thinking about media profoundly changes how we think about knowledge. Although the ulti­ mate horizon ofthis activity may not be clearly visible, the fact that future scholarship will change in radical ways as we adapt to new technologies of communicating knowledge is not in question. Alan Bewell Jon Klancher University of Toronto Carnegie MellonUniversity Christina Lupton Ted Underwood University of Michigan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Samuel Baker. Written on the Water: British Romanticism and the Maritime Empire of Culture. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press, 2010. Pp. 344. $49.50. In our contemporary age ofjet travel and bullet trains—to say nothing of email and Skype—it is easy to forget that, less than two centuries ago, when Britons wanted to travel beyond their country’s borders, voyage by sea was inevitable. Fortunately, we now have Samuel Baker’s Written on the Water to remind us. With its strong (but not exclusive) focus on the poetry and prose of the Lake Poets, Baker’s dense but readable study brilliantly re­ constructs the central roles of maritime and nautical cultures in Romanticera British literature. In the process, Baker not only puts forward new ideas about the relations between genre, mode, and politics in the period, but also points toward a new critical paradigm for understanding British Ro­ manticism that should nuance and complicate, if not entirely displace, the influential “Romantic imperialism” thesis popularized in the late 1990s. As Written on the Water persuasively demonstrates, the sea plays a variety SiR, 50 (Fall 2011) 544 BOOK REVIEWS ofroles in Romantic poetry and culture. One of its greatest strengths is the way it repeatedly manages to schematize large patterns of thought without oversimplifying them. Early in the book, for example, Baker establishes that “the sea” operated for the Romantics in at least two spheres simulta­ neously: the worldly (the domain of commerce and imperial expansion) and the allegorical (the domain of life and death, fate, and uncertainty). Thus, the sea was alternately “the avenue ofBritish geopolitical power, the ultimate arena ofcommerce and war and thus ofmodern social transforma­ tion, and the medium of any possible universal society” (41). The final phrase of this last clause, moreover, is important: as opposed to the para­ digm of “universal empire” (and here I refer of course to the subtitle of Saree Makdisi’s now-classic 1998 study), which polemically claimed that most outward-looking Romantic-era literature tacitly or explicitly sup­ ported Britain’s imperial ambitions in the period, Baker’s phrase “universal society” stakes a new—and, to my mind, ultimately more persuasive— claim: what the Romantics were truly interested in establishing was an em­ pire, neither of territory nor of peoples, but of culture. To this end, and drawing on Lacoue-Labarthe and Nancy’s terminology in The Literary Absolute, Baker posits a catachrestical duality that alternately inspired and vexed the Lake Poets and their contemporaries: absolute cul­ ture (“culture intellectualized as a complete hierarchy of kinds of human life”) and the cultural absolute (“culture experienced ... as a nonhierarchical multiplicity ofincommensurate kinds”) (72). In other words, for every attempt to establish or discover a uniquely British “culture”—especially one based on Britain’s geopolitical situation as an island nation embodying an ideal combination of trade, liberty, and Protestantism—that could...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it