MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2376561998

Nonlinear Dynamic System Identification Based on Relevance Vector Machine

2008· article· en· W2376561998 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJisuanji fangzhen · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelevance vector machineSupport vector machineComputer scienceKernel (algebra)Kernel methodArtificial intelligenceIdentification (biology)GeneralizationRelevance (law)SmoothnessNonlinear systemMachine learningAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)Mathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on Relevance Vector Machine, Sparse Bayesian, a kind of kernel method, which has the advantages such as its kernel functions without the restriction of Mercer condition, the relevance vectors automatically determinated, and smaller kernel functions, the smoothness priors restriction on Relevance Vector Machine (RVM) is suggested.The algorithmfast marginal likelihood maximization for sparse Bayesian modelsis applied to solve relevance vectors effectively, and improving the generalization of identification is also improved. The Cross Validation is adopted to determine the kernel parameter.The suggested method avoids the problem of difficultly determining the model structure by the Support Vector Machine for nonlinear dynamic system identification. Comparing with the Support Vector Machine, a quite simpler model structure is obtained. The result shows that the Relevance Vector Machine applied for nonlinear dynamic system identification achieves a better performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score0.651

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it