Minimizing Stack Memory for Hard Real-Time Applications on Multicore Platforms with Partitioned Fixed-Priority or EDF Scheduling
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multicore processors are increasingly adopted in resource-constrained real-time embedded applications. In the development of such applications, efficient use of RAM memory is as important as the effective scheduling of software tasks. Preemption Threshold Scheduling (PTS) is a well-known technique for controlling the degree of preemption, possibly improving system schedulability, and to reduce system stack usage. In this paper, we consider partitioned multi-processor scheduling on a multicore processor with either Fixed-Priority or Earliest Deadline First scheduling algorithms with PTS and address the design optimization problem of mapping tasks to processor cores and assignment of task priorities and preemption thresholds with the optimization objective of minimizing system stack usage. We present both optimal solution techniques based on Mixed Integer Linear Programming and efficient heuristic algorithms that can achieve high-quality results. We perform extensive performance evaluations using both synthetic tasksets and industrial case studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it