MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

FORMATION CONTROLLERS FOR UNDERACTUATED SURFACE VESSELS AND ZERO DYNAMICS STABILITY

2008· article· en· W2396364797 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Farbod Fahimi, S. V. Sudhil Rineesh, Coz J

Bibliographic record

VenueControl and Intelligent Systems · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnderactuationZero (linguistics)Control theory (sociology)Stability (learning theory)Dynamics (music)Surface (topology)Computer scienceMathematicsPhysicsControl (management)GeometryArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonlinear feedback control laws for controlling multiple robotic vessels in arbitrary formations are proposed. The presented leader-follower formation control approach uses only the inertial information obtained from the immediate neighbours of each vehicle via communication for control calculations. A three-degree-of-freedom (3DOF) surface vessel dynamic model and the method of Lyapunov has been used to derive the nonlinear control laws that stabilize the relative distance and orientation of neighboring vessels. It is shown that the internal dynamics of the 3DOF vessel as an underactuated system is also stable. The performance of these control laws is demonstrated in the presence of sea disturbances by computer simulations using a 6DOF dynamic model of the surface vessel. These controllers can be utilized to control an arbitrary number of robotic vessels moving in very general formations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueControl and Intelligent SystemsSame topicDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsFrench-language works237,207