MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Maximum Entropy Spectral Modeling Approach to Mesopic Tone Mapping

2013· article· en· W2398015170 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueColor and Imaging Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Enhancement Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsMesopic visionColor rendering indexTone mappingScotopic visionComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePhotopic visionSmoothingComputer visionMathematicsOpticsPhysicsHigh dynamic rangeDynamic range

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tone mapping algorithms should be informed by accurate color appearance models (CAM) in order that the perceptual fidelity of the rendering is maintained by the tone mapping transformations. Current tone mapping techniques, however, suffer from a lack of good color appearance models for mesopic conditions. There are only a few currently available appearance models suited to the mesopic range, none of which perform very well. In this paper, we evaluate some of the most prominent models available for mesopic and scotopic vision and, in particular, we focus on the iCAM06 model as one of the best-known tone reproduction techniques. We introduce a spectral-based color appearance model for mesopic conditions which can be incorporated in tone reproduction methods. Based on the maximum entropy spectral modeling approach of Clark and Skaff [1], this is a powerful color appearance model which can predict the color appearance under mesopic conditions as well as under photopic conditions. Our model incorporates the CIE system for mesopic photometry, leading to increased accuracy of color appearance model. At low (mesopic) light levels two factors come into play as compared with high light level (photopic) spectral modeling. The first is that image noise becomes significant. The Clark and Skaff model treats the noise as an inherent part of the modeling process, and an estimate of the noise level sets the tradeoff between the consistency of the solution with the measurements and the spectral smoothing imposed by the maximum entropy constraint. The second factor in mesopic vision is that both the rod and the cone systems are active, requiring a modification to the sensor model. The relative contribution of the rod and cone systems is dependent on the overall light level in this regime, and our approach is adaptive in this sense. We present several experiments comparing the performance of our tone mapping approach with that of the existing methods, showing that the proposed method works very well in this regard, and also demonstrates the potential of our model to become a part of wide-range tone mapping systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.688

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it