MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Control-Limit Policy And Software For Condition-Based Maintenance Optimization

2001· article· en· W2399793648 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueINFOR Information Systems and Operational Research · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReliability and Maintenance Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of TorontoNanyang Technological University
KeywordsLimit (mathematics)Control (management)SoftwareComputer scienceControl limitsReliability engineeringEngineeringMathematicsOperating systemArtificial intelligenceControl chart

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractThe focus of the paper is the optimization of condition-based maintenance decisions within the contexts of physical asset management. In particular, the analysis of a preventive replacement policy of the control-limit type for a deteriorating system subject to inspections at discrete points of time is presented. Cox's PHM with a Weibull baseline hazard function and time dependent stochastic covariates is used to describe the failure rate of the system. The methods of estimating model parameters and the calculation of the optimal policy are given. The structure of the decision-making software EXAKT is presented. Experience with collecting, preprocessing and using real oil and vibration data is reported.RésuméDans ce rapport il s'agit de l'optimisation du processus décisionnel par rapport à un programme de l'entretien par surveillance de la condition des machines. Plus spécifiquement on décrit l'analyse d'une politique de maintenance préventive appliqué à un système qui se détériore mais qui est sujet aux inspections aux moments précis. Le modèle par Cox qui si traite aux risques proportionnelles (PHM) comprennant une ligne de base Wiebull ainsi que des co-variants stochastiques est employé dans le bût de décrire le taux de défaults du système. Des méthodes pour effectuer l'estimation des paramètres du modèle ainsi que le calcul de la politque optimale sont présentés. L'architecture du logiciel décisionnel, EXAKT, est décrit. On inclut, également, dans ce rapport, de l'experience sur le collecte, le traitement, et l'usage des données provenant d'un programme d'analyse d'huile et de la vibration.Key words:: condition-based maintenanceproportional-hazards modelMarkov processcost minimizationdecision softwareMots-clés:: programme de l'entretien par surveillance de la condition des machinesmodelisation des risques proportionnelles (PHM)processus Marcovminimisation des coûtslogiciel décisionnel Additional informationNotes on contributorsD. BanjevicDragan Banjevic is a Research Associate in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering and Visiting Professor in the Department of Statistics, University of Toronto. His research interests are in theoretical and applied probability, especially in reliability. His papers have appeared in Statistics and Probability Letters, Journal of Applied Probability, Theory of Probability and its Applications and other journals.A.K.S. JardineAndrew Jardine is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at the University of Toronto. His teaching and research interests lie in the general area of Engineering Management with a special interest in maintenance. He has had practical experience in devising maintenance and replacement procedures for a number of national and international organizations. He is author of Maintenance, Replacement and Reliability and co-editor of Maintenance Excellence: Optimizing Life Cycle Deicisions.V. MakisViliam Makis is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto. His teaching and research areas include quality and reliability engineering with special interest in modeling and optimization of stochastic systems. His articles have appeared in Mathematics of Operations Research, Technometrics, IIE Transactions, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Journal of Applied Probability, Naval Research Logistics, EJOR, INFOR, Journal of the OR Society, International Journal of Production Economics, IMA Journal, Kybernetika, etc. He is a Senior Member of the Institute of Industrial Engineers and of the American Society for Quality.M. EnnisMarguerite Ennis obtained her B.Sc. in Statistics at the University of Stellenbosch in South Africa and her M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees at the University of Toronto. She is interested in the application of statistics in both the medical and industrial fields and works as a freelance consultant. in data analysis and statistical graphics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it