MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2403022727 · doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-043-0_8

SPOT Synthesis as a Tool to Study Protein–Protein Interactions

2011· article· en· W2403022727 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in molecular biology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsKinexus Bioinformatics Corporation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeptideCelluloseCombinatorial chemistryMembraneChemistryBiochemistryComputational biologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peptide arrays are a widely used tool in proteomic research for investigations of drug development and molecular interactions including protein-protein or protein-peptide interactions. Most peptide synthesis techniques are able to simultaneously synthesize only up to a few hundred single peptides. Using the SPOT™ technique, it is possible to synthesize and screen in parallel up to 8,000 peptides or peptide mixtures. In addition, such peptides can be released from the membrane and transferred onto peptide microarrays. Here we present protocols for the peptides synthesis on cellulose including the preparation of different cellulose membranes and easy-to-use detection methods on these peptide macroarrays. In addition, a protocol to produce and screen peptide microarray using the SPOT technology is provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.840

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it