MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2407062960 · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.9500

Genetic heterogeneity in primary and relapsed mantle cell lymphomas: Impact of recurrent <i>CARD11</i> mutations

2016· article· en· W2407062960 on OpenAlexaffabout
Chenglin Wu, Noel F.C.C. de Miranda, Longyun Chen, Agata M. Wasik, Larry Mansouri, Wojciech Jurczak, Krystyna Gałązka, Monika Długosz‐Danecka, Maciej Machaczka, Huilai Zhang, Roujun Peng, Ryan D. Morin, Richard Rosenquist, Birgitta Sander, Qiang Pan‐Hammarström

Bibliographic record

VenueOncotarget · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMantle cell lymphomaInternal medicineFamily medicineOncologyLymphoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

// Chenglin Wu 1 , Noel FCC de Miranda 1, * , Longyun Chen 1, 2, * , Agata M. Wasik 3, * , Larry Mansouri 4 , Wojciech Jurczak 5 , Krystyna Galazka 6 , Monika Dlugosz-Danecka 5 , Maciej Machaczka 7 , Huilai Zhang 8 , Roujun Peng 9 , Ryan D. Morin 10 , Richard Rosenquist 4 , Birgitta Sander 3 , Qiang Pan-Hammarstr&ouml;m 1 1 Division of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden 2 Beijing Genomics Institute, Shenzhen, China 3 Division of Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden 4 Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden 5 Department of Hematology, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, Krak&oacute;w, Poland 6 Department of Pathology, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, Krak&oacute;w, Poland 7 Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, Michalowskiego, Poland 8 Department of Lymphoma, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Tianjin, China 9 Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China 10 Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada * These authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Qiang Pan-Hammarstr&ouml;m, email: Qiang.Pan-Hammarstrom@ki.se Keywords: whole-exome sequencing, mantle cell lymphoma, relapse, CARD11, NF-&kappa;B inhibitor Received: September 19, 2015&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Accepted: May 01, 2016&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Published: May 20, 2016 ABSTRACT The genetic mechanisms underlying disease progression, relapse and therapy resistance in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) remain largely unknown. Whole-exome sequencing was performed in 27 MCL samples from 13 patients, representing the largest analyzed series of consecutive biopsies obtained at diagnosis and/or relapse for this type of lymphoma. Eighteen genes were found to be recurrently mutated in these samples, including known ( ATM, MEF2B and MLL2 ) and novel mutation targets ( S1PR1 and CARD11 ). CARD11, a scaffold protein required for B-cell receptor (BCR)-induced NF-&kappa;B activation, was subsequently screened in an additional 173 MCL samples and mutations were observed in 5.5% of cases. Based on in vitro cell line-based experiments, overexpression of CARD11 mutants were demonstrated to confer resistance to the BCR-inhibitor ibrutinib and NF-&kappa;B-inhibitor lenalidomide. Genetic alterations acquired in the relapse samples were found to be largely non-recurrent, in line with the branched evolutionary pattern of clonal evolution observed in most cases. In summary, this study highlights the genetic heterogeneity in MCL, in particular at relapse, and provides for the first time genetic evidence of BCR/NF-&kappa;B activation in a subset of MCL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations138
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOncotargetSame topicLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207