On The Generalized Fibonacci And Pell Sequences By Hessenberg Matrices.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the generalized Fibonacci and Pell Sequences and then show the relationships between the generalized Fibonacci and Pell sequences, and the Hessenberg permanents and determinants. 1. Introduction The Fibonacci sequence, fFng ; is de ned by the recurrence relation, for n 1 Fn+1 = Fn + Fn 1 (1.1) where F0 = 0; F1 = 1: The Pell Sequence, fPng ; is de ned by the recurrence relation, for n 1 Pn+1 = 2Pn + Pn 1 (1.2) where P0 = 0; P1 = 1: The well-known Fibonacci and Pell numbers can be generalized as follow: Let A be nonzero, relatively prime integers such that D = A +4 6= 0: De ne sequence fung by, for all n 2 (see [17]), un = Aun 1 + un 2 (1.3) where u0 = 0; u1 = 1: If A = 1; then un = Fn (the nth Fibonacci number). If A = 2; then un = Pn ( the nth Pell number). An alternative is to let the roots of the equation t At 1 = 0 be, for n 0 un = n n : The sequence fung have studied by several authors (see [6], [1]). The following identities can be found in [6], [1]:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it