MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2407544020

Ranking Web Pages Using Collective Knowledge.

2011· article· en· W2407544020 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueText REtrieval Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWeb Data Mining and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSearch engine indexingInformation retrievalWeb pageRanking (information retrieval)World Wide WebStatic web pageIndex (typography)Web navigation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indexing is a crucial technique for dealing with the massive amount of data present on the web. Indexing can be performed based on words or on phrases. Our approach aims to efficiently index web documents by employing a hybrid technique in which web documents are indexed in such a way that knowledge available in the Wikipedia and in meta-content is efficiently used. Our preliminary experiments on the TREC dataset have shown that our indexing scheme is a robust and efficient method for both indexing and for retrieving relevant web pages. We ranked term queries in different ways, depending if they were found in Wikipedia pages or not. This paper presents our preliminary algorithm and experiments for the ad-hoc and diversity tasks of the TREC 2011 Web track. We ran our system on the subset B (50 million web documents) from the ClueWeb09 dataset. Categories and Subject Description Web Information Retrieval: Content Analysis, Indexing, and Ranking

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score0.720

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it