NE Atlantic break-up: a re-examination of the Iceland mantle plume model and the Atlantic–Arctic linkage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Final break-up of Pangaea – opening of the NE Atlantic (NEA) and the Arctic Eurasia Basin – was associated with significant magmatism (in the NEA) and is commonly ascribed to thermal effects from a proto-Iceland plume. The plume is often assumed to be fixed with respect to the Earth’s core and to have governed NEA break-up. It is argued here that the Iceland anomaly, past and present, cannot represent a fixed plume, nor be rooted at the core–mantle boundary and that the Greenland–Faroes Ridge is inconsistent with a classic time-transgressive hotspot track. It is shown that the Iceland anomaly has probably been located at the constructive plate boundary (Mid-Atlantic Ridge and antecedents) since its inception. While recent studies allow for some ‘wandering’ of hotspots relative to the core and mantle, it is considered unlikely that such drift of a mantle plume would precisely match lithospheric drift in order to achieve constant centering on the spreading ridge. The alternative view is, therefore, supported – that the anomaly is an upper mantle response to plate break-up. The two pulses of NEA magmatism are related to separate phases of North Atlantic break-up. Early Paleocene magmatism (c. 62–58 Ma) was governed by a short-lived attempt at seeking a new rift path, intermediate in time and space between the Labrador Sea–Baffin Bay and the NEA–Eurasia Basin rifts. The voluminous Early Eocene magmatism (c. 56–53 Ma) along the NEA margins was related to final break-up of Pangaea, exploiting the collapsed Caledonian fold belt. The interpretations here are at odds with Iceland representing a classic Morgan-type plume and it is suggested that the magmatism in the NEA and the Iceland anomaly represent a ‘top-down’ effect of plate tectonics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".