MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2408149837 · doi:10.1144/0060739

NE Atlantic break-up: a re-examination of the Iceland mantle plume model and the Atlantic–Arctic linkage

2005· article· en· W2408149837 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Petroleum Geology Conference series · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlumeArcticMantle plumeGeologyMantle (geology)OceanographyClimatologyGeophysicsGeographyMeteorologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Final break-up of Pangaea – opening of the NE Atlantic (NEA) and the Arctic Eurasia Basin – was associated with significant magmatism (in the NEA) and is commonly ascribed to thermal effects from a proto-Iceland plume. The plume is often assumed to be fixed with respect to the Earth’s core and to have governed NEA break-up. It is argued here that the Iceland anomaly, past and present, cannot represent a fixed plume, nor be rooted at the core–mantle boundary and that the Greenland–Faroes Ridge is inconsistent with a classic time-transgressive hotspot track. It is shown that the Iceland anomaly has probably been located at the constructive plate boundary (Mid-Atlantic Ridge and antecedents) since its inception. While recent studies allow for some ‘wandering’ of hotspots relative to the core and mantle, it is considered unlikely that such drift of a mantle plume would precisely match lithospheric drift in order to achieve constant centering on the spreading ridge. The alternative view is, therefore, supported – that the anomaly is an upper mantle response to plate break-up. The two pulses of NEA magmatism are related to separate phases of North Atlantic break-up. Early Paleocene magmatism ( c . 62–58 Ma) was governed by a short-lived attempt at seeking a new rift path, intermediate in time and space between the Labrador Sea–Baffin Bay and the NEA–Eurasia Basin rifts. The voluminous Early Eocene magmatism ( c . 56–53 Ma) along the NEA margins was related to final break-up of Pangaea, exploiting the collapsed Caledonian fold belt. The interpretations here are at odds with Iceland representing a classic Morgan-type plume and it is suggested that the magmatism in the NEA and the Iceland anomaly represent a ‘top-down’ effect of plate tectonics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it