MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2409147217 · doi:10.1385/1-59745-026-x:217

Using the Global Proteome Machine for Protein Identification

2006· article· en· W2409147217 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsEmergent BioSolutions (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProteomeIdentification (biology)Interface (matter)InformaticsComputer scienceComputational biologyHuman proteome projectProteomicsBioinformaticsChemistryBiologyEngineeringBiochemistryOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter describes the use of an open-source, freely available informatics system for the identification of proteins using tandem mass spectra of peptides derived from an enzymatic digest of a mixture of mature proteins. The chapter describes the use of features of the Global Proteome Machine (GPM) interface that assist in making comprehensive assignments between spectra and sequences, including the detection of point mutations, posttranslational modifications, and experimental artifacts. The use of this interface to validate results using the GPM Database is also described. This data repository allows analysts to compare their own results to those obtained by other scientists to determine the degree to which their data are consistent with previous measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it