Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter draws on data from the French island of Corsica as a springboard for the discussion of bilingual practices and language ideologies and attitudes concerning bilingualism in minority language contexts. Contexts such as the Corsican one raise interesting questions about how bilingualism is defined and experienced, both at the individual and the societal level. This is because the processes of language domination, shift and revitalization found in such contexts both disrupt and make explicit connections between code(s) and identity(ies). This approach requires a historical perspective that examines the social, cultural, political, ideological and economic forces that make and unmake bilingual speakers. Building on the previous chapter, this chapter will look at the impact of processes of language domination on minority language practice and ideology, and crucially, on the discourses and practices that arise out of minority language revitalization movements that attempt to counteract language domination and dominant language ideologies by turning dominant language ideologies against the dominant group which invented them in the first place (essentially by accepting the legitimacy of the idea that language, nation and state do indeed coincide, just not in the particular configuration the dominant state prefers).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it