MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2419201994

Accelerating complex data transfer for cluster computing

2016· article· en· W2419201994 on OpenAlexaff
Alexey Khrabrov, Eyal de Lara

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSerializationComputer scienceBottleneckData transmissionDistributed computingOverhead (engineering)SPARK (programming language)JavaTransfer (computing)Parallel computingOperating systemEmbedded systemComputer networkProgramming language
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ability to move data quickly between the nodes of a distributed system is important for the performance of cluster computing frameworks, such as Hadoop and Spark. We show that in a cluster with modern networking technology data serialization is the main bottleneck and source of overhead in the transfer of rich data in systems based on high-level programming languages such as Java. We propose a new data transfer mechanism that avoids serialization altogether by using a shared clusterwide address space to store data. The design and a prototype implementation of this approach are described. We show that our mechanism is significantly faster than serialized data transfer, and propose a number of possible applications for it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and ScienceSame topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207