MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2437974153

La publicidad : fundamentos y límites constitucionales

2015· article· es· W2437974153 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAdvertising and Communication Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La publicidad, que debe prescindir del adjetivo comercial, es sometida a multiples restricciones y limitaciones sujetas a control de constitucionalidad. Para que esta evaluacion transcienda de la ocurrencia, mas o menos argumentada, requiere de unos fundamentos constitucionales que permitan ofrecer respuestas dotadas de coherencia, razonabilidad y seguridad juridica. Con esta finalidad se analizan los ordenamientos de EEUU, Italia, Canada, Reino Unido, asi como la jurisprudencia del TEDH y del TJUE. Con estos presupuestos se obtiene un concepto de publicidad que encuentra, predominantemente, amparo en las libertades del articulo 20; sus conexiones sistematicas con otros preceptos constitucionales amplian o limitan estos mensajes, asi el 38, 51 o 18, por citar los mas relevantes. Libro imprescindible no solo para constitucionalistas, civilistas y mercantilistas sino tambien para estudiosos del marketing y la publicidad, asi como para abogados y practicos del Derecho

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it