MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2438088690 · doi:10.3138/jcfs.31.3.339

Sharing a Man: Insights From Research

2000· article· en· W2438088690 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Comparative Family Studies · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFamily Dynamics and Relationships
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)SociologyGender studiesMarriage marketWelfareSingle mothersExtended familyCriminologyDemographic economicsPsychologyPolitical scienceGeographyDevelopmental psychologyEconomicsAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Less than half of the some 8.5 million black families in America are comprised of a married couple. This apparent “retreat” from marriage on the part of African Americans has received sporadic academic attention. Early cultural theorists argued that the “deviant” matriarchal family structure within the black community was in large part responsible for the significant rise in single parent families. More recently, structuralist have explained this “retreat” as largely reflecting changes in the economy and labor market that have given rise to increased single female headed families, welfare dependency and criminal incarceration. Missing from our discussions on black male/female marital formation, are the perceptions black women have about marriage, and the adaptative strategies they employ to deal with a diminished marriage pool. This paper attempts to address that omission, and to begin a discourse on the social context affecting a growing number of African Americans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score0.883

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.422
GPT teacher head0.501
Teacher spread0.080 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it