MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2462079183 · doi:10.1145/2890955.2890958

Beehive

2016· article· en· W2462079183 on OpenAlexafffund
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh, Yashar Ganjali

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBeehiveComputer scienceFinite-state machineDistributed computingThroughputOperating systemProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present the design and implementation of Beehive, a distributed control platform with a simple programming model. In Beehive, control applications are centralized asynchronous message handlers that optionally store their state in dictionaries. Beehive's control platform automatically infers the keys required to process a message, and guarantees that each key is only handled by one light-weight thread of execution (i.e., bee) among all controllers (i.e., hives) in the platform. With that, Beehive transforms a centralized application into a distributed system, while preserving the application's intended behavior. Beehive replicates the dictionaries of control applications consistently through mini-quorums (i.e., colonies), instruments applications at runtime, and dynamically changes the placement of control applications (i.e., live migrates bees) to optimize the control plane. Our implementation of Beehive is open source, high-throughput and capable of fast failovers. We have implemented an SDN controller on top of Beehive that can handle 200K of OpenFlow messages per machine, while persisting and replicating the state of control applications. We also demonstrate that, not only can Beehive tolerate faults, but also it is capable of optimizing control applications after a failure or a change in the workload.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207