Dynamics of a quadrotor undergoing impact with a wall
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the problem of the dynamics of a quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle undergoing impact with its environment. This work is motivated by the fact that operation of UAVs (manual or autonomous) carries with it a significant risk of collision with surrounding objects, particularly in unknown, unstructured environments. To make small UAVs more viable and expand their autonomy, our ultimate objective is to develop control methods which would allow automatic recovery from a `non-destructive' collision, where operation of the vehicle is not compromised. Towards this goal, we formulate the dynamics model of a quadrotor equipped with protective bumpers around its propellers, undergoing an arbitrary collision with a vertical wall: no prior assumptions are made regarding the points and number of impacts, nor the impact speed, nor the orientation of the vehicle at the instance of collision. The model is exercised through a series of simulations for different pre-impact attitudes of the platform and different approach speeds. Results of experimental tests conducted with Spiri quadrotor platform are presented. Comparison to the simulated responses mimicking the experimental pre-impact conditions and command inputs show excellent qualitative agreement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it