MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2463718273 · doi:10.1061/9780784479957.017

Quantifying Pipe Corrosion and Deterioration with Pipe Penetrating Radar

2016· article· en· W2463718273 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePipelines 2016 · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGround-penetrating radarRebarCorrosionSanitary sewerRadarTrenchGeologyGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringStructural engineeringForensic engineeringMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents recent advancements of pipe penetrating radar (PPR) inspection technology through two selected case studies. The Bear Creek Trunk Sewer in Surrey, BC, Canada is a 2845 m long, 600 mm to 900 mm diameter reinforced concrete and asbestos cement line. The pipe was installed in 1972 and there are known corrosion, erosion, sedimentation, and odor issues. The objective of the PPR survey was to determine the condition and remaining service life of this pipe by mapping its wall thickness, rebar cover and detecting voids and/or other anomalies within or outside the pipe wall. PPR results confirmed minimal corrosion at the crown and 95 mm to 97 mm remaining wall thickness with little variation over the inspected length. Rebar cover appeared to be sufficient with no void type anomalies on any of the inspected lines. The Taggart Outfall in Portland, Oregon is a 3 m diameter, brick lined combined sewer that was built in 1906 and experienced wet weather overflows in the past. There was very little information available about the construction methods and the condition of this pipe. In order to design the most appropriate rehabilitation strategy the knowledge of voids outside the sewer was critical. Over 1829 m of high resolution PPR line data were collected via manned entry. Due to the highly complex nature of the geophysical data, data processing and interpretation was a critical component of this project. PPR data revealed voids both outside and within the pipe wall and thus provided engineers the information needed to take the appropriate approach to rehabilitate the pipe. With limited available funding and budget constraints becoming more prevalent, timing of rehabilitation and overall intelligent asset management is more critical than ever. PPR provides engineers and utility owners the information to accurately estimate the remaining life left in a pipeline, refine timing of repairs, and ultimately better allocate funding for asset management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it