Silent No More: <i>Elderly Women's Stories of Living with Urinary Incontinence in Long-term Care</i>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Urinary incontinence (UI) is a prevalent health issue affecting the quality of life of many elderly women living in long-term care. Minimal consideration has been given to understanding the lived experience from women's perspectives. Using one-to-one interviews, this study explored elderly women's experiences with UI while living in long-term care facilities. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis that revealed three themes related to the meaning of UI to the women, physical implications of UI, and institutional culture of UI in long-term care. Within these three themes, the women expressed common concerns. The results of this study provided information that could influence changes in nursing practice related to individualized UI care, empowering women experiencing UI, and dispelling ageism in long-term care. The study also suggests opportunities for improving health care education related to the quality of life of women who experience UI, and the need to make the experience more visible and openly discussed as a health issue rather than the traditional condition of aging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it