MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2464580162 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.014104

Electronic structure of interstitial hydrogen in lutetium oxide from<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mtext>DFT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math>calculations and comparison study with<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>SR</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>spectroscopy

2016· article· lv· W2464580162 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Da Silva, A. G. Marinopoulos, Ricardo Vieira, R. C. Vilão, H. V. Alberto, J. M. Gil, R. L. Lichti, P. W. Mengyan, B.B. Baker

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2016
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldEngineering
TopicMuon and positron interactions and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWelch FoundationFederación Española de Enfermedades RarasTRIUMFUniversity of BathFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaUniversidade de Coimbra
KeywordsHyperfine structureMuoniumDensity functional theoryHydrogenElectronic structureAtomic physicsPhysicsMaterials scienceCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electronic structure of hydrogen impurity in ${\mathrm{Lu}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}$ was studied by first-principles calculations and muonium spectroscopy. The computational scheme was based on two methods which are well suited to treat defect calculations in $f$-electron systems: first, a semilocal functional of conventional density-functional theory (DFT) and secondly a $\text{DFT}+U$ approach which accounts for the on-site correlation of the $4f$ electrons via an effective Hubbard-type interaction. Three different types of stable configurations were found for hydrogen depending upon its charge state. In its negatively charged and neutral states, hydrogen favors interstitial configurations residing either at the unoccupied sites of the oxygen sublattice or at the empty cube centers surrounded by the lanthanide ions. In contrast, the positively charged state stabilized only as a bond configuration, where hydrogen binds to oxygen ions. Overall, the results between the two methods agree in the ordering of the formation energies of the different impurity configurations, though within $\text{DFT}+U$ the charge-transition (electrical) levels are found at Fermi-level positions with higher energies. Both methods predict that hydrogen is an amphoteric defect in ${\mathrm{Lu}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}$ if the lowest-energy configurations are used to obtain the charge-transition, thermodynamic levels. The calculations of hyperfine constants for the neutral interstitial configurations show a predominantly isotropic hyperfine interaction with two distinct values of 926 MHz and 1061 MHz for the Fermi-contact term originating from the two corresponding interstitial positions of hydrogen in the lattice. These high values are consistent with the muonium spectroscopy measurements which also reveal a strongly isotropic hyperfine signature for the neutral muonium fraction with a magnitude slightly larger (1130 MHz) from the ab initio results (after scaling with the magnetic moments of the respective nuclei).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicMuon and positron interactions and applicationsFrench-language works237,207