MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2465635778 · doi:10.2172/1155818

International Linear Collider Physics and Detectors (2011 Status Report)

2012· report· en· W2465635778 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBundesministerium für Wissenschaft und ForschungCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueState Atomic Energy Corporation ROSATOMMax-Planck-GesellschaftJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceIsrael Science FoundationNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftU.S. Department of EnergyEuropean CommissionAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaKorea Science and Engineering FoundationDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSNational Science Foundation
KeywordsInternational Linear ColliderColliderPhysicsWork (physics)DetectorParticle physicsNuclear physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The studies of physics and detectors for the International Linear Collider are an important parallel element to the effort for the ILC Technical Design Report. The studies comprise the physics opportunities, detector requirements, and detector development to achieve the challenging high performance demanded by the physics, as well as integration of detectors into the accelerator. The current phase of this effort began with a call for Letters of Intent (LOIs) in 2007 and will lead to the submission of Detailed Baseline Design (DBD) report together with the ILC Technical Design Report at the end of 2012. Here we summarise the current status of this process, review what it has accomplished and identify the work that still needs to be completed. This report, titled International Linear Collider Physics and Detectors: 2011 Status Report, does just this. This report begins with a discussion of the outstanding issues in physics that motivate the construction of the ILC. It describes the organisation of the LOI process, the validation of the LOIs by the International Detector Advisory Group, and the results of R&D carried out to support the detector designs. The details of the concept detectors have already been published in the LOIs, which were completed in 2009. This report will, in a complementary way, describe the status of the detector R&D for each individual detector component and the status of the physics simulation infrastructure that has been built for the detector design process. Much of this work is carried out in cooperation between the two detector concept groups. This report describes the five common task groups and two working groups that have organised these cooperative activities. Many members of the detector concept groups and the common task groups have contributed to this report. Many more people have carried out the actual work that is reviewed. The complete list of members of each detector concept group can be found from the author lists of the published LOIs. The members of the ILC physics and detector organisation are listed at the end of this document. As we are now nearing the completion of the DBD phase, we are also entering a new stage of our preparation process. The experiments at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, Switzerland, are accumulating data and are extending our knowledge of the physics of the teraelectronvolt energy scale. The LHC results may confirm the standard model of electroweak symmetry breaking or they may deliver something completely new. In either case, we believe, the ILC will be critical to resolve the questions that the LHC programme will bring forward. In any scenario, we will need very high-quality detectors and excellent technical and simulation capabilities. This report describes the status of our work in pursuit of that goal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it