MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2466152282 · doi:10.1080/0951192x.2015.1099072

Integrated products–systems design environment using Bayesian networks

2015· article· en· W2466152282 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayesian networkComputer scienceSystems engineeringBayesian probabilityArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Providing new design environments to assist manufacturing engineers is essential to decrease products’ lead time. Complex systems will be better designed and utilised to manufacture more products efficiently if systems–products’ relationships are retrieved automatically and effectively. In this paper, a design environment using a Bayesian network is proposed. It inducts the relationships within the products’ and machine’s domains and maps the relationships between the two domains. The design environment incorporates Necessary Path Condition used in structure learning in a Bayesian network, estimation–maximisation (EM), k-most probable configurations algorithm, and d-separation concepts to understand and analyse these relationships, hence, it facilitates synthesising new systems and product. Two case studies are presented involving: (1) milling machines and their corresponding machined parts, and (2) tools’ inserts used in grinding and their corresponding fixtures. In addition, a theorem is proposed, proved and discussed to justify the use of the Bayesian network for detecting the products–machines relationships. Results show that, unlike other design methodologies, the Bayesian networks can provide adaptable design environment by analysing the interactions between existing manufacturing entities such as machines/products and fixtures/inserts’ specifications in a reverse engineering manner, without clearly identifying all the relationships between them a priori. The Bayesian network’s inference capabilities are used to determine the most suitable machines/fixtures for new parts, and deduce the composite part/product that can be manufactured using newly acquired machines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it