MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2466543873 · doi:10.3917/rom.172.0057

Octave Crémazie. « L’héroïque poème » des Canadiens

2016· article· fr· W2466543873 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRomantisme · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Même si Garneau, Aubert de Gaspé père et fils, Crémazie ou Fréchette sont loin de pouvoir rivaliser avec Thoreau, Emerson, Melville ou Whitman, la littérature canadienne française s’ouvre, comme aux États-Unis au xix e siècle, sur un projet « national » d’inspiration épique. Octave Crémazie (1827-1879), qui incarne la figure romantique du poète national, y contribue par des poèmes patriotiques. Mais, loin de l’optimisme des premiers écrivains des États-Unis, Crémazie, lui-même marqué par son exil en France, reste hanté par les spectres de la perte de la Nouvelle-France. Les deux épisodes décisifs de l’histoire de « l’Amérique française » – Fort-Carillon, les Plaines d’Abraham – forment ainsi un diptyque de la désillusion, de la victoire à la défaite. L’épopée, qui célèbre la gloire mélancolique des vaincus, est placée sous le signe de l’échec, de la perte et du deuil. Crémazie en vient à désespérer d’une littérature « canadienne » qu’il appelait pourtant de tous ses vœux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it