MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2466631554 · doi:10.1021/jp106143s

H<sub>2</sub>S Adsorption on γ-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>Surfaces: A Density Functional Theory Study

2011· article· en· W2466631554 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Gas Emission Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysisorptionChemisorptionAdsorptionDensity functional theoryChemistryRange (aeronautics)Hydrogen bondBinding energySurface (topology)Physical chemistryHydrogenEnergeticsComputational chemistryCrystallographyMaterials scienceAtomic physicsMoleculeThermodynamicsPhysicsGeometryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The structures and energetics of various adsorption modes of H 2 S on the surfaces of γ-Al 2 O 3 have been determined using periodic density functional theory. The calculations located in total 10 stable adsorption configurations of H 2 S on the dehydrated (100)E and (110)C as well as the hydrated (110)C surfaces of γ-Al 2 O 3, and their binding energies fall in the range of 12−35 kcal/mol, which is in good agreement with experiments. It was noticed that H 2 S prefers chemisorption on clean surfaces free of water, while physisorption becomes important in the presence of surface hydroxyl groups. The computed vibrational frequencies for the adsorbed H 2 S are consistent with the reported values in the literature although slightly overestimated. The variations of the OH stretching modes observed in this study can be properly accounted for in terms of the geometric and electronic structures of the OH groups, the presence of hydrogen bonds, and the surface reconstruction due to H 2 S adsorption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it