8th Symposium on Frequency Standards and Metrology 2015
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The eighth Symposium on Frequency Standards and Metrology [1] has been organized from 12-16 October in the Seminaris SeeHotel near Lake Templin at Potsdam, Germany. The symposium included a keynote lecture by David Wineland, 48 invited oral presentations and a session with 111 invited poster contributions. The symposium is the most recent one of a series that was initially organized by Jacques Vanier in 1971 in Forét Montmorency in Quebec, Canada. The next ones took place in 1976 in Copper Mountain, USA, organized by Helmut Hellwig, 1981 in Aussois, France (Claude Audoin) [2], 1988 in Ancona, Italy (Andrea De Marchi) [3], 1995 in Woods Hole, USA (James Bergquist) [4], 2001 in St Andrews, UK (Patrick Gill) [5], and 2008 in Pacific Grove, USA (Lute Maleki) [6]. The symposium series serves as an international discussion forum on precision frequency standards throughout the electromagnetic spectrum and associated metrology. It focuses on the fundamental scientific aspects of the latest ideas, results and applications in relation to these frequency standards. During the seven years after the last symposium very significant progress has occurred in various associated fields. Carrying forward the historical sketch by David Wineland [7] it is interesting to wrap up the new ideas, the novel technologies, developments and inventions that have been created and implemented in the seven years since the last symposium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it