MétaCan
← all works

[The right not to know, in the German legislation (Part I)].

2005· article· en· 0 citations· W2468248009 on OpenAlex

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.

The three-model screen

all 1,000 screened works →

All three models called this out of scope.

stratum: aff_core · design weight: 5595.24 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: conceptual
about Canada: no
confidence: medium

Legal analysis of the right not to know in German legislation; medical law and bioethics, not research practice.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre: conceptual
about Canada: no
confidence: high

It analyzes a legal and ethical right in German legislation.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre: conceptual
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Legal-ethical discussion of the right not to know in German law, not research practice.

Abstract

The right not to know entails being aware of a reality which corresponds to the mental representation one makes of a circumstance through external sensory perceptions or through intellectual actions from which one derives conclusions. The author discusses the different manifestations of this right not to know, from the right not to be informed to a general right of waiver.

Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.

The record

Venue
PubMed
Topic
Medical and Health Sciences Research
Field
Medicine
Canadian institutions
Optech (Canada)
Funders
Keywords
Right to knowWaiverGermanLegislationNeed to knowLawPerceptionRepresentation (politics)Political sciencePsychologyLaw and economicsSociologyComputer scienceComputer securityPhilosophyLinguistics
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes