MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2468494510 · doi:10.1061/9780784479957.028

Application of Neural Networks in Predicting the Remaining Useful Life of Water Pipelines

2016· article· en· W2468494510 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePipelines 2016 · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline transportRobustness (evolution)Artificial neural networkBreakageComputer scienceEngineeringDeep waterReliability engineeringOperations researchMarine engineeringArtificial intelligenceEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water distribution networks have significant impact on public health. Based on the 2013 ASCE’s report card, 21st century estimated to be the end of effective life for the majority of water distribution networks in the United States. It is essential to implement accurate and cost-effective models to estimate deterioration rates along with remaining useful life (RUL) of the pipelines to select and perform necessary intervention plans to prevent disastrous failures. This study aims to present a computational model to predict the RUL of water pipelines utilizing artificial neural network (ANN) model. Literature reveals that condition, length, diameter, and breakage rate are the most important factors in prediction of RUL. Based on the available data from the city of Montreal, the condition of pipelines is identified and used as the inputs for ANN model in addition to physical data. Since the model shows robustness and accuracy in estimating RUL, it can support municipality of Montreal in future planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.594
Threshold uncertainty score0.194

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it