Novel Modifications to Carbon-Based Electrodes to Improve the Electrochemical Detection of Dopamine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, we describe three simple modifications to carbon electrodes that were found to improve the detection of an exemplar neurotransmitter (dopamine) in the presence of physiological interferents (ascorbic acid and/or uric acid). First, the electro-oxidation of ascorbic acid, as a pretreatment, at boron-doped diamond electrode (BDE) interfaces is studied. This treatment did suppress the detection of ascorbic acid oxidation signal, but only in a manner suitable for single-use detection of high concentrations of dopamine (i.e., > 1 μM). Second, the hydrogenation of BDE by electrochemical cathodic treatment and plasma hydrogenation was investigated. Large cathodic, applied potentials (i.e., > - 5 V) and hydrogen plasma pretreatment of BDE lead to the partial and complete oxidization of ascorbic acid before dopamine, respectively. The consequence at hydrogen-plasma treated BDE is the complete electrochemical separation of these two species without any typical catalytic reactions between the analytes. Third, the modification of glassy carbon electrodes with carbon black nanoparticles is explored. This modification enables the simultaneous detection of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid, significantly enhancing the sensitivity of dopamine. Dopamine was best detected using the unconventional route of detecting 5,6-dihydroxyindole, which is made possible by use of carbon-black nanoparticles. The potential of all three studied modifications to be of electroanalytical use is highlighted throughout this work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".