MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2468838613 · doi:10.1021/bk-2005-0904.ch006

Microbially Mediated Subsurface Calcite Precipitation for Removal of Hazardous Divalent Cations: Microbial Activity, Molecular Biology, and Modeling

2005· book-chapter· en· W2468838613 on OpenAlexaff
Frederick S. Colwell, Robert W. Smith, F. G. Ferris, Anna‐Louise Reysenbach, Yoshiko Fujita, T. L. Tyler, Joanna L. Taylor, Amy B. Banta, Mark E. Delwiche, Travis McLing, Mary E. Watwood

Bibliographic record

VenueACS symposium series · 2005
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial Applications in Construction Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersIdaho Operations Office, U.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsAquiferAlkalinityEnvironmental chemistryUreaseChemistryCalciteGroundwaterUreaEnvironmental scienceGeologyMineralogyBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current approaches for remediating hazardous divalent cations in aquifers are costly, can generate large volumes of waste, and focus on the small amounts of contaminants in the water rather than the larger reservoir of contamination sorbed to the aquifer matrix. An alternative to waste removal and repackaging is to encourage in situ biogeochemical processes to permanently bind the contaminants in the mineral matrix of an aquifer. Our research involves one such approach in which we accelerate calcite precipitation (an on going geochemical process in arid western aquifers) and the assisted co-precipitation of cationic contaminants like strontium-90 using biologically driven urea hydrolysis to increase aquifer pH and alkalinity. This paper describes progress related to stimulating and measuring indigenous urease activities in aquifer microbes and how these activities can be modeled for application in an aquifer of concern to the U.S. Department of Energy. Experiments using 14 C-labeled urea indicated that microbial communities from the Snake River Plain aquifer (SRPA) of eastern Idaho hydrolyzed urea at rates higher than those measured for a model urea hydrolyzing bacterium (Bacillus pasteurii) under similar conditions, if they were provided a source of organic carbon along with the urea. By using a phylogenetic approach for analyzing urease gene sequences we developed polymerase chain reaction primer pairs that detected the ureC gene in urease positive microbial isolates. In a field test where molasses and urea were added to the SRPA, the ca. 400 base pair ureC fragment was amplified from DNA extracted from aquifer cells. Amplification and sequencing of bacterial 16S rDNA gene fragments from the aquifer before and after the molasses and urea additions indicated measurable changes in the communities as a result of the treatment. Rate constants derived from urease activity experiments were used to simulate the calcite precipitation process in the SRPA. The model predicts that field application would result in three distinct geochemical reaction phases: a condition where urea hydrolysis rates exceed calcite precipitation rates, a condition where calcite precipitation rates exceed urea hydrolysis rates, and finally a condition where the two rates are equal. The model also indicates that most of the metals that are precipitated as carbonates will come from the aquifer matrix, not the groundwater. These two modeling observations suggest that when the rates of calcite precipitation and urea hydrolysis are equal, the entire process can be described by a pseudo-first order kinetic model. In this model the calcite precipitation rate is controlled by the urea hydrolysis rate and is independent of the concentration of calcium in the groundwater. The use of these techniques for determining the response of microbial communities to urea additions, as well as the predictive capabilities of the model, will allow better control and evaluation of pending field experiments to test calcite precipitation as an approach for contaminant removal from aquifers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS symposium seriesSame topicMicrobial Applications in Construction MaterialsFrench-language works237,207